Evaluation of disability glare caused by headlights of most common vehicles in Iran

Authors

1 Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

2 Social Determinates of Health Research Center, Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran

3 Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 PhD Candidate in Occupational Health, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Student Research Committee, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

5 Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, Environmental Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran

6 Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Road traffic accident is one of the leading causes of death in some countries such as Iran. Disability glare due to headlights of vehicles can increase the risk of crashes and make dangerous conditions. This study aimed to investigate the level of glare induced by the headlights of most common vehicles in Iran. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in a suburban road of Ilam province in 2019. The disability glare resulted from the headlights of Pride Saba GTX, Pride 131SL, Samand Soren, Peugeot 405, Megan, and Peugeot Pars was measured at the distances of 10–100 m away from the headlights. The Threshold Elevation index under the high-beam and low-beam conditions (headlight's operation modes) was obtained for the background luminance condition including 1 and 50 cd/m2 for the age groups of 20, 35, 70, and 83 years old. Results: When the background luminance was 1 cd/m2, the mean glare level caused by the high-beam mode of illumination exceeded the recommended disability glare thresholds of all age groups. When the background luminance was 50 cd/m2, at certain longitudinal distances, glare level exceeded the disability glare thresholds of the elderly drivers (aged 70 and 83 years). At the background luminance of 1 cd/m2, low-beam mode of illumination caused disability glare at certain distances but not in general. At the background luminance of 50 cd/m2, low-beam mode of illumination did not cause disability glare at any distance. Conclusion: The results showed the mutual effect of luminance and the angle of line of sight with respect to glare source on the emergence of disability glare. The age also exhibited a significant association with the disability glare, as the highest glare levels were obtained for older drivers.

Keywords


  1. Bahadorimonfared A, Soori H, Mehrabi Y, Delpisheh A, Esmaili A, Salehi M, et al. Trends of fatal road traffic injuries in Iran (2004‑2011). PLoS One 2013;8:e65198.
    2. Alimohammadi I, Hajizadeh R, Mehri A, Sajedifar J, Sadat S, Gholampoor J, Kangavari M. The impact of traffic noise on mental performance considering complexity of activities. Health and Safety at Work 2015;5:37-46.
    3. Chenani SB, Vaaja MT, Kurkela M, Kosonen I, Luttinen T. Target detection distances under different road lighting intensities. European transport research review 2017;9:1-0.
    4. Adresi A, Zahedi A, Zarinkia M, Beheshti H. Relation Between Speed And Maximum Speed Limit With Safety In Road Network. Rahvar. 2011;8:65-78. Available from: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=212073. [Last Cited on 2021Apr 20].
    5. Soori H, Ainy E, Zayeri F, Mehmandar MR. Comparison of road traffic death occurrence within urban and metropolitan roads focusing on environmental factors. Hakim Research Journal 2013;15:339-45.
    6. Sullivan JM, Flannagan MJ. The role of ambient light level in fatal crashes: Inferences from daylight saving time transitions. Accid Anal Prev 2002;34:487‑98.
    7. Sewall AAS, Borzendowski SAW, Tyrrell RA. ‘The Accuracy of Drivers’ Judgments of the Effects of Headlight Glare on Their Own Visual Acuity’, Perception, 2014;43:1203-13. doi: 10.1068/p7814.
    8. Gruber N, Mosimann UP, Müri RM, Nef T. Vision and night driving abilities of elderly drivers. Traffic Inj Prev 2013;14:477‑85.
    9. Massie DL, Campbell KL, Williams AF. Traffic accident involvement rates by driver age and gender. Accid Anal Prev 1995;27:73‑87.
    10. Mehri A, Farhang Dehghan S, Abbasi M, Beheshti MH, Sajedifar J, Jafari SM, et al. Assessment of contrast perception of obstacles in a tunnel entrance. Health Promot Perspect 2018;8:268‑74.
    11. Fekete J, Sik‑Lányi C, Schanda J. Spectral discomfort glare sensitivity investigations. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2010;30:182‑7.
    12. Raynham P, An examination of the fundamentals of road lighting for pedestrians and drivers. Light Res Technol 2004;36:307‑13.
    13. Gray R, Regan D. Glare susceptibility test results correlate with temporal safety margin when executing turns across approaching vehicles in simulated low‑sun conditions. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007;27:440‑50.
    14. Aslam TM, Haider D, Murray IJ. Principles of disability glare measurement: An ophthalmological perspective. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007;85:354‑60.
    15. Lachenmayr B. Traffic ophthalmology. Assessment of ability to drive in road traffic. Ophthalmologe 2006;103:425‑43.
    16. Mortimer RG. Requirements for Automobile Exterior Lighting. In Proceedings of Spring NAS–NRC Committee Meeting on Vision: Visual Factors in Transportation Systems, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Washington, DC; 1969.
    17. Ranney TA, Simmons LA, Masalonis AJ. Prolonged exposure to glare and driving time: Effects on performance in a driving simulator. Accid Anal Prev 1999;31:601‑10.
    18. Lachenmayr B, Berger J, Buser A, Keller O. Reduced visual capacity increases the risk of accidents in street traffic. Ophthalmologe 1998;95:44‑50.
    19. Ranney TA, Masalonis AJ, Simmons LA. Immediate and long-term effects of glare from following vehicles on target detection in driving simulator. Transportation research record 1996;1550:16-22.
    20. Theeuwes J, Alferdinck JW, Perel M. Relation between glare and driving performance. Hum Factors 2002;44:95‑107.
    21. Puell MC, Palomo C, Sánchez‑Ramos C, Villena C. Mesopic contrast sensitivity in the presence or absence of glare in a large driver population. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004;242:755‑61.
    22. Hemion RH. A preliminary cost-benefit study of headlight glare reduction. Traffic Systems Reviews & Abstracts, Contract No Cpr 114126;1969.
    23. Kim W, Koga Y. Effect of local background luminance on discomfort glare. Build Environ 2004;39:1435‑42.
    24. Hirning M, Isoardi G, Cowling I. Discomfort glare in open plan green buildings. Energy Build 2014;70:427‑40.
    [Downloaded free from http://www.archtrauma.com on Wednesday, September 14, 2022, IP: 178.131.153.140]Mehri, et al.: Evaluation of disability glare of vehicle headlightsArchives of Trauma Research ¦ Volume 10 ¦ Issue 2 ¦ April‑June 2021 79
    25. Vos JJ. On the cause of disability glare and its dependence on glare angle, age and ocular pigmentation. Clin Exp Optom 2003;86:363‑70.
    26. Gogula M. The impact of modern headlamps on the design of sag vertical curves (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University).
    27. Balk S, Tyrrell R. The Accuracy of Drivers’ Judgments of the Effects of Headlight Glare: Are We Really Blinded by the Light. In Meeting of the 6th International Symposium on Driving Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Lake Tahoe, CA; 2011.
    28. Schieber F, Harms M. Analytic Study of Daytime Running Lights as Potential Sources of Disability and Discomfort Glare under Ambient Illumination Conditions Ranging from Dawn through Dusk. Vermillion, SD: Heimstra Human Factors Laboratories, University of South Dakota; 1998.
    29. Feniosky P, Liang LY, Khaled E, Ibrahim OS, Frank B, Marwa H; Mostafa E. Research Report FHWA-ICT-08-014, A report of the findings of ICT R27-2 Nighttime Construction: Evaluation of Lighting Glare for Highway Construction in Illinois. Illinois Center for Transportation December 2007.
    30. Mehri A, Sajedifar J, Abbasi M, Tajbakhsh M. The effect of Veiling luminance on the disability glare of car headlamps designed in Iran. International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics. 2021 Mar 4(just-accepted):1-5.
    31. Mehri A, Sajedifar J, Abbasi M, Naimabadi A, Mohammadi AA, Teimori GH, Zakerian SA. Safety evaluation of lighting at very long tunnels on the basis of visual adaptation. Safety science. 2019;116:196-207.
    32. Mehri A, Hajizadeh R, Farhang Dehghan S, Nassiri P, Jafari SM, Taheri F, et al. Safety Evaluation of the Lighting at the Entrance of a Very Long Road Tunnel: A Case Study in Ilam. Saf Health Work 2017;8:151‑5.
    33. Kang B, Yong B, Park K. Performance evaluations of LED headlamps. Int J Automot Technol 2010;11:737‑42.
    34. Mehri A, Sajedifar J, Abbasi M, Jalali M, Gholampour J, Salehian T, et al. The evaluation of luminance in a road tunnel based on CIE88-2004 standard to reduce road accidents. ioh. 2020;17:1-13.
    35. Foley DJ, Heimovitz HK, Guralnik JM, Brock DB. Driving life expectancy of persons aged 70 years and older in the United States. Am J Public Health 2002;92:1284‑9.
    36. Hammad HM, Ashraf M, Abbas F, Bakhat HF, Qaisrani SA, Mubeen M, et al. Environmental factors affecting the frequency of road traffic accidents: A case study of sub‑urban area of Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2019;26:11674‑85.
    37. Hatton J. Aging and the glare problem. J Gerontol Nurs 1977;3:38‑44.
    38. Rubin GS, Ng ES, Bandeen‑Roche K, Keyl PM, Freeman EE, West SK. A prospective, population‑based study of the role of visual impairment in motor vehicle crashes among older drivers: The SEE study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:1483‑91.
    39. Hanrahan RB, Layde PM, Zhu S, Guse CE, Hargarten SW. The association of driver age with traffic injury severity in Wisconsin. Traffic Inj Prev 2009;10:361‑7.
    40. Wei F, Wang Z, Lin PS, Hsu PP, Ozkul S, Jackman J, et al. Safety effects of street illuminance at urban signalized intersections in Florida. Transportation Research Record. 2016;2555:95-102.
    41. Elvik R. Meta‑analysis of evaluations of public lighting as accident countermeasure. Transp Res Rec 1995;1485:12‑24.
    42. Mace D, Garvey P, Porter RJ, Schwab R, Adrian W. Countermeasures for reducing the effects of headlight glare. American Automobile Association Foundation for Traffic Safety 2001.
    43. Garner GR, Deen RC. Elements of median design in relation to accident occurrence. Highway Research Board bulletin. 1973;432:1-1.
    44. Knuiman MW, Council FM, Reinfurt DW. Association of median width and highway accident rates (with discussion and closure). Transportation Research Record. 1993;1401:70-82.
    45. Aashto A. Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials; 2001. p. 158.