Factors affecting petrochemical industry preparedness in fire: A qualitative study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Workplace Health Promotion Research Center (WHPRC), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention Research Center, Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Life Style Institute; Faculty of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

5 Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

6 Environment Manager, National Iranian Petrochemical Company, Tehran, Iran

7 Workplace Health Promotion Research Center (WHPRC), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran & Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), H1, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Huddinge, Sweden

10.4103/atr.atr_46_22

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The preparedness of petrochemical industries against disasters is important to control risks, reduce losses and possible damages. Studies have shown that preparedness is an important factor in the disaster response phase. This study aimed to explore the factors influencing industry preparedness in fire. 
Methods: This study was conducted from July 2020 to December 2021, with a qualitative case study design. The population included 22 people including 12 crisis managers, three Health, Safety, and Environment chief officers, two operational commanders in the fire department, two policymakers and three university professors. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews and purposeful sampling, which continued until saturating the data. The strategies recommended by Guba and Lincoln were used for evaluating the trustworthiness of the data. The data were analyzed using the conventional content analysis method according to the method suggested by Graneheim and Lundman. 
Results: The effective components of the petrochemical industry preparedness for fire were classified into six main categories and 16 subcategories. Categories and subcategories covered fire characteristics (nature and chain of fire), policy-making (regulations, incident information documentation, and incident insurance incentives), and management factors (commitment and leadership, incident command, communication and information, and planning). The others involved support factors (equipment supply, coordination and cooperation, and training and awareness), safety culture (risk management, monitoring and auditing, inherently safe design), and sanction consequence (software and hardware). 
Conclusions: Many factors affect the petrochemical industry's preparedness for fire. Adopting effective management and appropriate policy regarding preparedness with strategies for promoting and developing a safety culture can improve the preparedness of petrochemical industries in disasters.

Keywords

References

1.
Malmasi s, Jozi sa, Monavari sm, Jafarian Moghadam e. Environmental Impacts of PET- PTA Petrochemical Industries (Case Study: Mahshahr Economic Special Zone). Human & Environment 2010;8:73-81.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Shaluf IM, Ahmadun FR, Said AM. Fire incident at a refinery in West Malaysia: The causes and lessons learned. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2003;16:297-303.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
M. S. Mannan, Lees' Loss Prevention in the Process Industries: Hazard Identification, Assessment and Control, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam, NL, 4th edn, 2012.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Nivolianitou Z, Konstandinidou M, Michalis C. Statistical analysis of major accidents in petrochemical industry notified to the major accident reporting system (MARS). J Hazard Mater 2006;137:1-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Liu X, Zhang Q, Xu XJ. Petrochemical plant multi-objective and multi-stage fire emergency management technology system based on the fire risk prediction. Procedia Engineering 2013;62:1104-11.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Safoura K, Mostafa Mirzaei A, Iraj M. Human errors assessment for board man in a control room of petrochemical industrial companies using the extended CREAM. J Health Field 2018;6:28.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Omidvar M, Mazlomi A, MohammadFam I, Rahimi Foroushani A, Nirumand F. Development of a framework for assessing organizational performance based on resilience engineering and using fuzzy AHP method: A case study of petrochemical plant. JHSW 2016;6:43-58.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Abbassinia M, Kalatpour O, Soltanian AR, Mohammadfam I, Ganjipour M. Determination and score of effective criteria to prioritize emergency situations in a petrochemical industry. Occup Hygene Health Promot J 2019;3:16-25.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Saloua B, Mounira R, Salah MM. Fire and explosion risks in petrochemical plant: Assessment, modeling and consequences analysis. J Fail Anal Prev 2019;19:903-16.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Naderi M, Mohammadfam I, Kalatpour O. Determining training needs of emergency response team's using task criticality analysis at Bouali Sina Petrochemical Co. And comparison with the HAZWOPER standard. Iran Occup Health 2020;17:233-43.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Mortazavi S, Parsarad M, Mahabadi HA, Khavanin A. Evaluation of chlorine dispersion from storage unit in a petrochemical complex to providing an emergency response program. Iran Occup Health 2011;8:68-77.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Rebeeh Y, Pokharel S, Abdella GM, Hammuda A. A framework based on location hazard index for optimizing operational performance of emergency response strategies: The case of petrochemical industrial cities. Saf Sci 2019;117:33-42.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Einarsson S, Rausand MJ. An approach to vulnerability analysis of complex industrial systems. Risk analysis 1998;18:535-46.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Girgin S. The natech events during the 17 August 1999 Kocaeli earthquake: Aftermath and lessons learned. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 2011;11:1129-40.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Tenny S, Brannan JM, Brannan GD. Qualitative Study. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2022, StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2022.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24:105-12.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Lincoln YS, Guba EG. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Dir Program Eval 1986;1986:73-84.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Shie RH, Chan CC. Tracking hazardous air pollutants from a refinery fire by applying on-line and off-line air monitoring and back trajectory modeling. J Hazard Mater 2013;261:72-82.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Cozzani V, Gubinelli G, Salzano E. Escalation thresholds in the assessment of domino accidental events. J Hazard Mater 2006;129:1-21.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Kadri F, Châtelet E, Chen G. Method for quantitative assessment of the domino effect in industrial sites. Process Saf Environ Prot 2013;91:452-62.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Salehi V, Zarei H, Shirali GA, Hajizadeh K. An entropy-based TOPSIS approach for analyzing and assessing crisis management systems in petrochemical industries. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2020;67:104241.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Belke JC. Chemical accident risks in US industry – A preliminary analysis of accident risk data from US hazardous chemical facilities. Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries. Elsevier; 2001. p. 1275-314.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Gupta AK, Nair SS. Chemical (Industrial) Disaster Management, Trainer's Module. New Delhi: National Institute of Disaster Management(Ministry of Home Affairs) 2012. p. 20. Available at: https://www. nidm.gov.in.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Xue Y, Fan Y, Xie X. Relation between senior managers' safety leadership and safety behavior in the Chinese petrochemical industry. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2020;65:104142.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Zahiri Harsini A, Ghofranipour F, Sanaeinasab H, Amin Shokravi F, Bohle P, Matthews LR. Factors associated with unsafe work behaviours in an Iranian petrochemical company: Perspectives of workers, supervisors, and safety managers. BMC Public Health 2020;20:1192.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Kestenbaum R. Incident Command System Experience and Training in the Midstream and Downstream Oil and Gas Sector: California State University, Long Beach; 2019.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Tim Perkins K, editor. An Integrated Approach to Corporate Preparedness. 2005 International Oil Spill Conference, IOSC 2005; 2005.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Rahimi E, Javanmard H, Portabatabaei SA. Designing a strategic model for crisis management in a petrochemical industry. Strateg Manag Res 2017;23:99-114.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Fowkes V, Blossom HJ, Sandrock C, Mitchell B, Brandstein K. Exercises in emergency preparedness for health professionals in community clinics. J Community Health 2010;35:512-8.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Farhadi S, Mohammadfam I, Kalatpour O. Introducing a pattern for developing emergency scenarios in industries and studying the conformity of the exercised scenarios in the process industries with the presented pattern %. J Iran Occup Health J 2017;14:72-81.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Yang M, Khan F, Amyotte PJ, Protection E. Operational risk assessment: A case of the Bhopal disaster. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2015;97:70-9.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Mohammadfam I, Bastani S, Golmohamadi R, Saei A, Es-Haghi MJ. Applying social network analysis to evaluate preparedness through coordination and trust in emergency management. Environmental Hazards 2015;14:329-40.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Khankeh HR, Khorasani-Zavareh D, Johanson E, Mohammadi R, Ahmadi F, Mohammadi R. Disaster health-related challenges and requirements: A grounded theory study in Iran. Prehosp Disaster Med 2011;26:151-8.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Majidpour M. The unintended consequences of US-led sanctions on Iranian industries. Iran Stud 2013;46:1-15.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Ahmadi A. The impact of economic sanctions and the JCPOA on energy sector of Iran. Glob Trade Customs J 2018;13:198-223.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
Archives of Trauma Research
Volume 11, Issue 4
December 2022
Pages 189-198

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 19 June 2023
  • Accept Date: 19 June 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics