Accuracy of plain radiography in cervical spine injury

Authors

1 Department of Radiology, Besat Hospital, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

2 Department of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

3 Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Besat Hospital, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

4 Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Routine clinical examination and plain radiography are reportedly inadequate for the determination of cervical injury. Accordingly, it is required to perform computed tomography (CT) scan on the cervical spine in suspected trauma cases, even in those with normal clinical examination findings. However, the risk of radiation and financial charges should be also considered in these cases. Therefore, the present study was conducted to compare the accuracy of plain radiography with that of CT (a gold standard) in the evaluation of cervical spine injury. Materials and Methods: This diagnostic study was conducted on 220 trauma patients (the mean age of 38.25 ± 5.13 years) referred to the Emergency Department of Besat Hospital, Hamadan, Iran, from April 2019 to March 2020. The patients with the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study low-risk criteria underwent CT and plain radiography. Results: According to the results, 210 (95.5%) patients were normal in both imaging modalities. Out of 10 patients with abnormal CT, four patients were detected by the plain radiography. Therefore, the plain radiography had the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of 40%, 100%, 97.2%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: As the findings indicated, plain radiography was inadequate for the definite exclusion of cervical spine injury. Therefore, this modality should be considered only in low-risk patients. On the other hand, patients with moderate and high probability of injuries need to undergo a CT scan as the only and first screening imaging modality. However, a low-dose CT scan is a preferred protocol for this group of patients.

Keywords

References

1. Braken MB, Freeman DH Jr., Hellenbrand K. Incidence of acute traumatic hospitalized spinal cord injury in the United States, 1970‑1977. Am J Epidemiol 1981;113:615‑22.
2. Lekovic GP, Harrington TR. Litigation of missed cervical spine injuries in patients presenting with blunt traumatic injury. Neurosurgery 2007;60:516‑22.
3. Diaz JJ Jr., Gillman C, Morris JA Jr., May AK, Carrillo YM, Guy J. Are five‑view plain films of the cervical spine unreliable? A prospective evaluation in blunt trauma patients with altered mental status. J Trauma 2003;55:658‑64.
4. Duane TM, Dechert T, Wolfe LG, Aboutanos MB, Malhotra AK, Ivatury RR. Clinical examination and its reliability in identifying cervical spine fractures. J Trauma 2007;62:1405‑8.
5. Duane TM, Mayglothling J, Wilson SP, Wolfe LG, Aboutanos MB, Whelan JF, et al. National Emergency X‑Radiography Utilization Study criteria is inadequate to rule out fracture after significant blunt trauma compared with computed tomography. J Trauma 2011;70:829‑31.
6. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography – An increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2277‑84.
7. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64‑slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 2007;298:317‑23.
8. Tan LA, Kasliwal MK, Traynelis VC. Comparison of CT and MRI findings for cervical spine clearance in obtunded patients without high impact trauma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014;120:23‑6.
9. Davis JW, Phreaner DL, Hoyt DB, Mackersie RC. The etiology of missed cervical spine injuries. J Trauma 1993;34:342‑6.
10. Insko EK, Gracias VH, Gupta R, Goettler CE, Gaieski DF, Dalinka MK. Utility of flexion and extension radiographs of the cervical spine in the acute evaluation of blunt trauma. J Trauma 2002;53:426‑9.
11. Turetsky DB, Vines FS, Clayman DA, Northup HM. Technique and use of supine oblique views in acute cervical spine trauma. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:685‑9.
12. Griffen MM, Frykberg ER, Kerwin AJ, Schinco MA, Tepas JJ, Rowe K, et al. Radiographic clearance of blunt cervical spine injury: Plain radiograph or computed tomography scan? J Trauma 2003;55:222‑7.
13. Schenarts PJ, Diaz J, Kaiser C, Carrillo Y, Eddy V, Morris JA Jr. Prospective comparison of admission computed tomographic scan and plain films of the upper cervical spine in trauma patients with altered mental status. J Trauma 2001;51:663‑9.
14. Edwards MJ, Frankema SP, Kruit MC, Bode PJ, Breslau PJ, van VugtAB. Routine cervical spine radiography for trauma victims: Does everybody need it? J Trauma 2001;50:529‑34.
15. Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, Todd KH, Zucker MI. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X‑Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000;343:94‑9.
16. Coffey F, Hewitt S, Stiell I, Howarth N, Miller P, Clement C, et al. Validation of the Canadian c‑spine rule in the UK emergency department setting. Emerg Med J 2011;28:873‑6.
17. McCulloch PT, France J, Jones DL, Krantz W, Nguyen TP, Chambers C, et al. Helical computed tomography alone compared with plain radiographs with adjunct computed tomography to evaluate the cervical spine after high‑energy trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:2388‑94.
18. Widder S, Doig C, Burrowes P, Larsen G, Hurlbert RJ, Kortbeek JB. Prospective evaluation of computed tomographic scanning for the spinal clearance of obtunded trauma patients: Preliminary results. J Trauma 2004;56:1179‑84.
19. Gale SC, Gracias VH, Reilly PM, Schwab CW. The inefficiency of plain radiography to evaluate the cervical spine after blunt trauma. J Trauma 2005;59:1121‑5.
20. Sanchez B, Waxman K, Jones T, Conner S, Chung R, Becerra S. Cervical spine clearance in blunt trauma: Evaluation of a computed tomography‑based protocol. J Trauma 2005;59:179‑83.
21. Tins BJ, Cassar‑Pullicino VN. Imaging of acute cervical spine injuries: Review and outlook. Clin Radiol 2004;59:865‑80.
22. Holmes JF, Akkinepalli R. Computed tomography versus plain radiography to screen for cervical spine injury: A meta‑analysis. J Trauma 2005;58:902‑5.
23. Mathen R, Inaba K, Munera F, Teixeira PG, Rivas L, McKenney M, et al. Prospective evaluation of multislice computed tomography versus plain radiographic cervical spine clearance in trauma patients. J Trauma 2007;62:1427‑31.
24. Mower WR, Hoffman JR, Pollack CV Jr, Zucker MI, Browne BJ, Wolfson AB, et al. Use of plain radiography to screen for cervical spine injuries. Ann Emerg Med 2001;38:1‑7.
25. Bailitz J, Starr F, Beecroft M, Bankoff J, Roberts R, Bokhari F, et al. CT should replace three‑view radiographs as the initial screening test in patients at high, moderate, and low risk for blunt cervical spine injury: A prospective comparison. J Trauma 2009;66:1605‑9.
26. Hunter BR, Keim SM, Seupaul RA, Hern G. Are plain radiographs sufficient to exclude cervical spine injuries in low‑risk adults? J Emerg Med 2014;46:257‑63.
27. Hashem R, Evans CC, Farrokhyar F, Kahnamoui K. Plain radiography does not add any clinically significant advantage to multidetector row computed tomography in diagnosing cervical spine injuries in blunt trauma patients. J Trauma 2009;66:423‑8.
28. Sheikh K, Belfi LM, Sharma R, Baad M, Sanelli PC. Evaluation of acute cervical spine imaging based on ACR Appropriateness Criteria®. Emerg Radiol 2012;19:11‑7.
29. Blackmore CC, Ramsey SD, Mann FA, Deyo RA. Cervical spine screening with CT in trauma patients: A cost‑effectiveness analysis. Radiology 1999;212:117‑25.
30. Grogan EL, Morris JA Jr, Dittus RS, Moore DE, Poulose BK, Diaz JJ, et al. Cervical spine evaluation in urban trauma centers: Lowering institutional costs and complications through helical CT scan. J Am Coll Surg 2005;200:160‑5.
31. Mulkens TH, Marchal P, Daineffe S, Salgado R, Bellinck P, te Rijdt B, et al. Comparison of low‑dose with standard‑dose multidetector CT in cervical spine trauma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1444‑50.
32. McLaughlin PD, Ouellette HA, Louis LJ, Mallinson PI, O’Connell T, Mayo JR, et al. The emergence of ultra‑low‑dose computed tomography and the impending obsolescence of the plain radiograph? Can Assoc Radiol J 2013;64:314‑8.
33. Kim SJ, Bista AB, Min YG, Kim EY, Park KJ, Kang DK, et al. Usefulness of low dose chest CT for initial evaluation of blunt chest trauma. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96(23):e7234.
Archives of Trauma Research
Volume 10, Issue 2
April 2021
Pages 80-85

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 14 September 2022
  • Accept Date: 14 September 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics