1. Ball CG. Damage control resuscitation: History, theory and technique. Can J Surg 2014;57:55‑60.
2. Moore EE. Trauma surgery: Is it time for a facelift? Ann Surg 2004;240:563‑4.
3. Peitzman AB. Status of trauma and acute care surgery in the United States. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2008;14:1‑4.
4. Spain DA, Miller FB. Education and training of the future trauma surgeon in acute care surgery: Trauma, critical care, and emergency surgery. Am J Surg 2005;190:212‑7.
5. Galante JM, Phan HH, Wisner DH. Trauma surgery to acute care surgery: Defining the paradigm shift. J Trauma 2010;68:1024‑31.
6. Ball CG, Das D, Roberts DJ, Vis C, Kirkpatrick AW, Kortbeek JB, et al. The evolution of trauma surgery at a high‑volume Canadian centre: Implications for public health, prevention, clinical care, education and recruitment. Can J Surg 2015;58:19‑23.
7. Jinescu G, Lica I, Beuran M. Traumatic colon injuries – Factors that influence surgical management. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2013;108:652‑8.
8. Chico‑Fernández M, Terceros‑Almanza LL, Mudarra‑Reche CC. Innovation and new trends in critical trauma disease. Med Intensiva 2015;39:179‑88.
9. Pretz JL, Magnus D, Spain DA. Emergency innovation: Implications for the trauma surgeon. J Trauma 2009;67:1443‑7.
10. Velmahos GC, Alam HB. Acute care surgery: The natural evolution of trauma surgery. Scand J Surg 2010;99:59‑60.
11. Makkizadeh F, Hazeri A, Hosininasab SH, Soheili F. Thematic analysis and scientific mapping of papers related to depression therapy in PubMed. J Health Adm 2016;19:51‑63.
12. Yao Q, Chen K, Yao L, Lyu PH, Yang TA, Luo F, et al. Scientometric trends and knowledge maps of global health systems research. Health Res Policy Syst 2014;12:26.
13. Börner K, Scharnhorst A. Visual conceptualizations and models of science. J Informetr 2009;3:161‑72.
14. Sedighi M. Using co‑word analysis method in mapping of the structure of scientific fields (Case Study: The Field of Informetrics). Iran Res Inst Sci Technol 2015;30:373‑96.
15. Xiuwen Chena B, Chena J, Wua D, Xiea Y, Lic J. Mapping the research trends by co‑word analysis based on keywords from funded project. Procedia Comput Sci 2016;91:547‑55.
16. Neff MW, Corley EA. 35 Years and 160,000 Articles: A bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology. Scientometrics 2009;80:657‑82.
17. Porter A, Rafols L. Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics 2009;81:719‑45.
18. VanEck NJ. Waltman L. Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: Ding Y, Rousseau R, Wolfram D, ediotrs. Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice. Q J Res Addict 2017;11:285‑320.
19. Börner K, Klavans R, Patek M, Zoss AM, Biberstine JR, Light RP, et al. Design and update of a classification system: The UCSD map of science. PLoS One 2012;7:e39464.
20. VanEck NJ. Waltman L. Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. ISSI Newsletter 2011;7:50‑4.
21. VanEck NJ. Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010;4:523‑38.
22. Lee S. A study on research trends in public library research in Korea using keyword networks. Libri 2016;66:263‑74.
23. Hu J, Yin Z. Research patterns and trends of recommendation system in China using co‑word analysis. Inform Process Manage 2015;51:329‑39. 24. Hu C, Hu SL, Liu H. A co‑word analysis of library and information science in China. Scientometrics 2013;97:369‑82.
25. Makkizadeh F, Hazeri A. Thematic analysis and scientific mapping of papers related to addiction in medline. J Health Adm 2016;19:51‑63.